Are Doctors Causing Infant Brain Damage By Clamping The Umbilical Cord Prematurely?
Newborn lungs exist in a “compacted state” suitable for the womb. When the infant is born, the placenta and cord pulse for up to 20 minutes, delivering a burst of blood volume to the infant’s system. This blood burst is just what is needed for the lungs of the newborn to expand.
Unfortunately, many hospitals and doctors don’t understand the mechanics of this and are engaging in early umbilical cord clamping — often within one minute of birth.
Without the burst of blood from the placenta, the infant suffers a drop in blood pressure as its lungs fail to open as they should, creating a chain reaction of effects that can include brain damage and lung damage. Immediate cord clamping can cause hypotension, hypovolemia and infant anemia, resulting in cognitive deficits. Some have even theorized that the rise in autism could be linked at least in part to early cord clamping.
replays to this article :
When a baby is born, one of the first procedures performed is the clamping and cutting of the umbilical cord. In hospitals, this task is often done before 30 seconds have elapsed because it’s believed it will reduce the mother’s risk of excess bleeding and the baby’s risk of jaundice.
Very often cords are clamped early also to collect cord blood and cord stem cells to be used for various medical and commercial purposes.
However, research is increasingly revealing that clamping the umbilical cord prematurely, before two or even three full minutes have elapsed, robs your baby of much-needed blood and oxygen.
Today there is absolutely no consensus about the optimal time to clamp the umbilical cord after birth, yet over 200 years ago in 1801, Erasmus Darwin (Charles Darwin’s grandfather) shared some wise words on the topic that have been largely overlooked:
“Another thing very injurious to the child, is the tying and cutting of the navel string too soon; which should always be left till the child has not only repeatedly breathed but till all pulsation in the cord ceases.
As otherwise the child is much weaker than it ought to be, a portion of the blood being left in the placenta, which ought to have been in the child.”
Suffocating Baby at Birth?
One of the primary arguments for delaying cord clamping has to do with the way a baby breathes just before and after being born.
Before birth, the baby’s lungs are filled with fluid and very little blood flows through them; the child receives oxygen from its mother through the placenta and cord. This placental oxygen supply continues after the child is born until the lungs are working and supplying oxygen — that is, when they are filled with air and all the blood from the right side of the heart is flowing through them.
After birth, when the child is crying and pink, the cord vessels clamp themselves. During this interval between birth and natural clamping, blood is transfused from the placenta to establish blood flow through the baby’s lungs. The natural process protects the baby’s brain by providing a continuous oxygen supply from two sources until the second source is functioning well.
However, according to George M. Morley, M.B., Ch. B., FACOG of Cordclamping.com, immediate cord clamping at birth instantly cuts off the placental oxygen supply and the baby remains asphyxiated until the lungs function. Blood, which normally would have been transfused to establish the child’s lung circulation, remains clamped in the placenta, and the child diverts blood from all other organs to fill the lung blood vessels.
While most full-term babies have enough blood to establish lung function and prevent brain damage, the process often leaves them pale and weak. For premature babies, the process can be even more devastating. And no matter what, immediate cord clamping will cause some degree of asphyxia and loss of blood volume because it:
1. Completely cuts off the infant brain’s oxygen supply from the placenta before lungs begin to function.
2. Stops placental transfusion — the transfer of a large volume of blood (up to 50% increase in total blood volume) that is used mainly to establish circulation through the baby’s lungs to start them functioning.
Injuries Related to Immediate Cord Clamping
Keeping valuable oxygen and blood from an infant by clamping the umbilical cord prematurely increases the baby’s risk of brain hemorrhage and breathing problems. It has also been implicated as a contributing factor to:
• Autism
• Cerebral Palsy
• Anemia
• Learning disorders and mental deficiency
• Behavioral disorders
• Respiratory distressImmediate cord clamping has even been identified as causing brain injuries that lead to death, according to Morley.
Are You Seeking Natural Childbirth Options?
Given the overwhelming research about the potential harms of early cord clamping, both the World Health Organization and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) have dropped the practice from their guidelines.
But it is still widely done in the United States and other developed countries, especially if you give birth in a hospital with an obstetrician (specially trained surgeons). This is one of many reasons why you may want to consider having a midwife deliver your baby instead.
There is not a single report in the scientific literature that shows obstetricians to be safer than midwives for low risk or normal pregnancy and birth. So if you are among the more than 75 percent of all women with a normal pregnancy, the safest birth attendant for you and your baby is in fact not a doctor but a midwife or doula.
A midwife will be more accommodating to your wishes, such as waiting for two to three minutes, or until the umbilical cord has stopped pulsating, before it is cut. Caesarean rates and use of other drug and surgical interventions also tend to be lower when you use a midwife.
One study in the British Medical Journal even found that a woman’s risk of death during delivery is three to five times higher during caesarean than a natural delivery, her risk of hysterectomy four times higher, and her risk of being admitted to intensive care is two times higher.
Fortunately, there are many excellent resources out there for anyone who is planning a natural childbirth, including delayed cord clamping, and here are some to get you started.
Source:
http://m.kenyon.webnode.com/umbilical-cord-articles/
A genuinely excellent publish by you my friend. I’ve bookmarked this page and will occur back following several days to examine for any new posts which you make.
So what happens if like me you had a horrendous 2nd pregnancy where the baby died at 34 weeks and you nearly died too, and was now pregnant again and told you had to have a c-section at 37 weeks as it was too dangerous to go into a natural labour… I am terrified of what is going to happen as they cut the cord within seconds of delivery and at 37 weeks too that is just too scary…
Dear Ann, I would pray a lot and trust your gut. If you dont like your doctor/midwife, please find another/ better one. I would talk a lot to different doctorsa dn what they say. I wish you all th ebest!!!!
Ann, You can demand the doctors leave the cord connected till it is done pulsating even in ceasartian delivery, your body, your baby, your decisions hun… take a look at this information i found helpful and could be useful for you…;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2613254/
hope that helps for you. It is about how to help your baby have the best start even when a ceasarian is needed. A ceasarian is far from ideal but if it is essential there are ways (as described in the link above) to ensure the best outcome for the baby and mum if you make sure you get a doctor who is on board with you (and if they are not it is time tog et a new doc
)
I just want to point out that doulas do not deliver babies. They are there to support the parents during labor, not to offer medical care for mother or baby. While many midwives are wonderful, there is a percentage of midwives who deliver in hospitals who are just as committed to high-intervention deliveries as some physicians and obstetricians. This is not the normal case, but please be sure to interview your midwife carefully. Don’t assume that just because she is a midwife, she is committed to a policy of non-intervention.
Very interesting! I had my daughter with a midwife in November and only knew about delayed clamping briefly. I did a lot of research on whether I wanted a hospital or out of hospital birth. But there are still so many more aspects to birth and what you want for your birth including delayed clamping! It was amazing holding my daughter on my chest and hearing my my midwife say “here, feel the cord pulse, and when it stops we’ll have daddy here cut it,” as she held it up to me.
Hmmm…. this explains why my baby was blue for five minutes after our planned c-section. And she stayed pale and bluish like until she passed away. Unfortunately everyone said she was fine.
The trend is to get the mother and baby through fast even at the expense of their health and in some cases risk to their lives. Most mothers are not aware of the benefits of delaying clamping. They trust that those tending to them in the hospital would know what is best. What a price we pay.
My baby had her cord clamped and cut immediately because she was in distress. The result of that action, instead of letting the blood flow and oxygen go back to her (it’s believed that she compressed the cord), was Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, Cerebral Palsy, Acquired Microcephaly, seizures, and she is tube fed. I even told them not to cut the cord. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the cord or placenta. She could have been fine if they had left her alone. The ACOG needs to reformulate their recommendations, and I firmly believe that delivery rooms need to have tables available to resuscitate the newborn that attached to the delivery beds so that the cord may remain intact while they do whatever they have to. Many a baby could be spared if this was so. Needless to say, I will never have another baby in a hospital. They do not respect your wishes, and my daughter suffered because of it.
Shocking! My son, who is now 30, was exactly the same weight as my daughter, but the doctor said that he “got stuck” and wanted to do an emergency C.Sect. This is the same doctor who lied on my daughter’s birth cert, saying he was present, when he was an hour late. The nurses delivered my daughter. The doctor walked into my hospital room later that morning, and couldn’t even see through his coke-bottle glasses to find me in the room.
The doctor was warned by the anesthesiologist about my blood pressure during the CS, when there was imminent danger of losing me. My son has always had some problems I couldn’t identify as any one issue, but this might be actually behind all of it.
I was so disgusted with his incompetence, when my 3rd baby was born, we moved to a different city. He was the only OB/gyn in town where we left.
Excellent, I’m glad cord blood storage has brought me to research the effects of early cord clamping.
Is there any benefit to drawing blood after the cord has stopped pulsating? is there enough of a viable sample left to use for storage purposes?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Any future children of ours will have INTACT umbilical cords until at least after placenta has been delivered and cord has stopped pulsating!
Check out http://www.cord-clamping.com
I think it’s so important that health care providers STOP cutting the cord immediately!
It makes me so sad that they are still performing such a harmful practise!
Dear Ladies, there si a lso such thing as a LOtus birth where placenta stays attached to the cord and baby until it falls off by itself